Pine Tree Power proposal decisively voted down

By receiving more than 70 percent of the votes, CMP and Versant will remain primarily in control of electricity used throughout the state.
Voters stand at voting booths to fill out their ballots on Election Day.
Photo by Caitlin Andrews.

The effort to create a consumer-owned utility called Pine Tree Power failed decisively Tuesday, with more than 70 percent of voters casting ballots against the measure. 

The referendum vote ended more than two years of back-and-forth on the proposal, which first arose as a bill introduced to the Maine House of Representatives by Rep. Seth Berry in 2021. The question was put on the ballot after the 2021 bill was vetoed by Gov. Janet Mills, who also opposed Question 3. 

Tuesday’s result means there will be no change in who controls the poles, wires and substations that deliver electricity throughout the state, infrastructure owned primarily by Central Maine Power and Versant Power. CMP is part of Avangrid, a subsidiary of Spanish utility Iberdrola; Versant Power is owned by Enmax, a Canadian utility company owned by the city of Calgary.

Proponents of Pine Tree Power garnered high-profile endorsements from prominent figures, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and climate activist Bill McKibben, but were outspent on advertising 37-1, which Al Cleveland, the Pine Tree Power campaign manager, said in a statement the campaign “couldn’t overcome.”

Despite the resounding defeat, the campaign remained defiant, saying the loss “does not change the fact that the state’s corporate utilities are failing Mainers and there is a powerful movement demanding better.”

Pine Tree Power supporters argued that, in part by not sending profits to shareholders, a consumer-owned utility would be able to lower rates, better help the state meet its clean energy goals and provide more reliable service. Our Power, which led the campaign for the change, raised roughly $1.2 million, mostly from individuals. 

Opponents of the measure maintained that any savings to ratepayers would be offset by the billions the new utility would spend acquiring the assets of CMP and Versant, and a legal fight over the cost would distract from and delay progress on combating climate change.

Parent companies of the two utilities spent more than $37 million to defeat the proposal, with the Enmax-controlled Political Action Committee, Maine Energy Progress, spending $14.5 million, and the Avangrid-controlled PAC, Maine Affordable Energy, spending $23.3 million.

“We are grateful that Maine voters took the time to learn about this expensive and risky scheme,” said B.J. McCollister, campaign manager for Maine Energy Progress.

“Question 3 would have put Maine people on the hook for $13.5 billion, with no guarantee of lower rates or faster progress on the transition away from fossil fuels. Question 3 presented itself as a simple solution to very complex issues, and voters weren’t willing to take a chance on something as important as our state’s electrical grid.


Kate Cough

Kate Cough is editor of The Maine Monitor. She previously served as enterprise editor for The Monitor while also covering energy and the environment and writing the weekly Climate Monitor newsletter. Before joining The Monitor, Kate was a beat reporter for The Ellsworth American and digital media strategist for The Ellsworth American and Mount Desert Islander. Kate graduated with honors from Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and Magna Cum Laude from Bryn Mawr College. Kate is an eighth generation Mainer, who lives on Mount Desert Island with her husband, daughter, and dogs.
Previous Post
A causeway in Machias that runs over a river.

MaineDOT closes part of Machias dike, changing plans

Next Post
A woman beats a hand-held drum as part of a Passamaquoddy cultural event

Language-keepers film stirs emotions among Passamaquoddy tribal citizens

The Maine Monitor has five newsletters to keep you informed about Maine.