Documents show how incoming Speaker Nutting inflated Medicaid charges more than $1 million

Inflated charges and failure to keep adequate records led to state’s finding that Nutting’s pharmacy over-billed the state $1.6 million, of which he failed to pay back $1.2 million after the pharmacy went bankrupt.
A scattered stack of $100 dollar bills with the image of Benjamin Franklin visible
Photo by Sergey Kuzmin/Shutterstock.

In 2001, True’s Pharmacy in Oakland, owned by incoming Speaker of the House Robert Nutting, bought medical gloves for $4.39 per package. By the time True’s sold them to a Medicaid provider, the price had gone up to $11.11.

That markup — 153 percent — was much more than was allowed by Maine’s Medicaid program, known as MaineCare, which requires only a 40 percent mark up.

Nutting contended in state hearings that his use of a different formula to calculate the markup — a formula which put more money in his pocket — was the accepted method.

Although the state ruled its Medicaid formula — not Nutting’s — should have been followed, the state said that even if it allowed Nutting’s formula, True’s still “overcharged MaineCare 100% of the time …”

Such inflated charges — multiplied by thousands of gloves, adult diapers and other supplies — and the failure to keep adequate records led to the state’s finding that Nutting’s pharmacy over-billed the state $1.6 million, of which he failed to pay back $1.2 million after the pharmacy went bankrupt.

Nutting is the presumptive speaker of the house, selected by fellow Republican legislators two weeks ago. His election to the third most powerful post in state government will not become official until he is approved by the full legislature in January.

Despite the recent revelations that Nutting left the state and federal Medicaid programs with the $1.2 bad debt, Republicans and even some Democrats have said it will not harm his chance to become speaker.

The Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting has analyzed state and federal records to draw a precise picture of how True’s came to charge Medicaid so much more for supplies than it was supposed to.

How, for example, did one package of medical gloves leap from costing $4.39 to $11.11?

The investigatory records of the state Department of Human Services, as it was called 10 years ago, show that Nutting’s pharmacy pushed its prices up that high in two steps:

First, True’s charged the 40 percent markup allowed by Medicaid, but based it on the sales price of the product. Medicaid rules say the markup should be based on the acquisition cost — what it cost the pharmacy to buy the product from the supplier.

Second, True’s then added another markup to that first one.

Take the medical gloves, for example.

In 2001, Nutting bought 4,800 packages of latex and other medical gloves for $4.39 per package. If he had followed state regulations, he would have sold them to a Medicaid provider, such as a nursing home, for no more than $6.22 — a 40 percent markup.

But Nutting told the state he used a different formula — one he had learned in pharmacy school — that is based on the sales price, not the acquisition price, to set the markup. He did that by dividing what he paid for the product by .6.

That is contrary to state regulations. If he had used that improper .6 formula, he would have sold the gloves for $7.31 per package.

In fact, the state says he sold them for much more. He sold the packages of gloves for $11.11, a markup of $6.72 or 153 percent.

When the state added up all the gloves True’s billed Medicaid for between 1997 and 2001, it concluded, ” … Medicaid overpaid True’s by $531,792.73.”

The state’s research of pricing formulas cited a survey that would appear to partially support one part of Nutting’s markup method.

Of 23 New England pharmacies responding to a poll, 16 used True’s’ .6 markup formula and six marked up the way the state mandates. But the survey was not related to Medicaid charges.

A DHS audit of 13 medical suppliers like True’s showed that none used the .6 formula that True’s used.

In a study of Medicaid claims filed by True’s between the end of 1999 and May 2001, the state found “Trues overcharged MaineCare (Maine’s Medicaid program) 100% of the time.”

The study added that this was true even if the state calculated those charges based on True’s formula.

In interviews with the Center and the Sun Journal, Nutting said the overbillings were “honest,” “unintentional” and the result of “confusing regulations.”

Steve Mistler of the Sun Journal contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

John Christie

John Christie is the co-founder, former publisher and former senior reporter of the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting. He has covered local, state and national politics as a reporter, editor and publisher at newspapers in Maine, Massachusetts and Florida and holds a BA in political science from the University of New Hampshire.
Previous Post
Exterior of the Maine State House

GOP backers from 2003 still with Nutting

Next Post
The former True's Pharmacy building in Oakland

Nutting property sales off-limits in pharmacy bankruptcy

The Maine Monitor has five newsletters to keep you informed about Maine.