L.D. 1537: PFAS pollution

An Act to Amend the Laws Relating to the Prevention of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Pollution.
A decorative graphic with the Maine State Legislature, overlayed with text that says what bill is being highlighted.
Industry representatives and environmentalists butted heads as legislators debated requirements for PFAS reporting and removal.
The Maine Monitor is recapping the 131st Legislature by highlighting legislative bills you should know about. View all of our recaps.

Legislators amended Maine’s landmark law regulating the use of “forever chemicals” by setting a 2032 deadline to remove PFAS from most products, and exempting those from the medical and transportation manufacturing industries. 

Removal deadlines were shortened to 2026 for cookware, cosmetics and other consumer products, and extended for others, including heating, refrigerants, air conditioners and artificial turf.

Industry representatives and environmentalists butted heads as legislators debated requirements for PFAS reporting and removal.

The industry representatives argued the initially proposed restrictions would hinder business, with some manufacturers threatening to leave Maine, while environmentalists said the law’s previous form already provided exemptions and public health should take priority.

Read the full bill on the legislature’s website.

For a better sense of the debate, here are some excerpts from testimony. (It was provided shortly after the bill’s introduction, before changes to loosen deadlines and provide certain exemptions.)

For:

To fully support Maine’s agricultural community and Maine farmers who have been impacted by PFAS contamination, we must significantly slow the flow of PFAS into our environment and L.D. 1537 makes practical changes to advance efforts to do so.” ~ Shelley Megquier, Maine Farmland Trust

Against:

“L.D. 1537 would effectively dismantle important protections within the law — provisions that had been carefully negotiated and agreed to by the legislature, NGOs, and business community — and unnecessarily expands the obligations imposed on manufacturers.” ~ Kelsey Johnson, Personal Care Products Council

Share

Emmett Gartner

Emmett Gartner is an environmental reporter for The Maine Monitor. Having grown up on the Chesapeake Bay, Emmett has long been interested in stories of adaptation and accountability.

He joined the newsroom in 2023 as a Roy W. Howard fellow and now explores how environmental policy aligns with Mainers’ lived experiences and where climate change complicates the status quo.

Previously, he reported for a daily newspaper in Maryland and spent separate summer stints working as a trail maintenance worker in Nevada, a wildland firefighter in Oregon and an environmental educator on Maryland’s Eastern Shore.

Contact Emmett with questions, concerns or story ideas: emmett@themainemonitor.org

Previous Post
A decorative graphic with the Maine State Legislature, overlayed with text that says what bill is being highlighted.

L.D. 2087: Land for transmission lines

Next Post
A decorative graphic with the Maine State Legislature, overlayed with text that says what bill is being highlighted.

L.D. 779: Child welfare agency

Total
0
Share